Could acupuncture be used to treat lazy eye?

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – Sticking acupuncture needles into points on the body classically associated with vision in Chinese medicine could prove to be an alternative to bothersome patches or drops for older children with a “lazy eye,” suggests new research.

Children who received needling from a certified acupuncturist saw similar improvement in their affected eyes as those who underwent the standard treatment of wearing a patch over the strong eye for a couple hours a day in order to strengthen the weak eye: Most participants in both groups advanced two lines or more on an eye chart over the course of the study.

Experts don’t recommend that parents swap out patches for acupuncture treatments just yet, however. Further research is needed to confirm the findings and to better understand just how the therapy works.

“Acupuncture has been used for a lot of things in Chinese medicine,” senior researcher Dr. Robert Ritch of the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary, told Reuters Health. “And it’s being used more and more in the West. But evidence-based medicine to see what it actually does is relatively lacking.”

Up to 5 percent of people around the world suffer from amblyopia, a condition characterized by poor vision in one eye and colloquially called lazy eye. It is the most common cause of vision problems in children.

Between 30 and 50 percent of amblyopia cases are caused by differences in the degree of nearsightedness or farsightedness between the two eyes, termed anisometropic amblyopia.

The problem can be corrected with glasses or contact lenses if caught at an early age. But both are less effective for children beyond about the age of 7, who have traditionally been treated with patches.

“Patching can be annoying for kids,” Dr. Matthew Gearinger of the University of Rochester, New York, who was not involved in the study, told Reuters Health. “It may be socially tough to wear a patch at school, and wearing a patch at home can interfere with homework.”

Specially medicated eye drops, another common treatment, blur sight in the good eye and can also make homework difficult, added Gearinger.

In the new study, Ritch and Chinese colleagues looked at 88 children in China between the ages of 7 and 12 who suffered from lazy eye and had already been wearing glasses for at least 16 weeks. They randomly assigned about half the children to wear a patch over the good eye for two hours every day, and the other half to attend five acupuncture sessions weekly; both groups underwent their respective treatments for up to 25 weeks.

All the children were also given new glasses to wear and asked to perform an hour of daily near-vision activities.

By the end of the 25 weeks, the researchers found that at least 7 out of 10 children in each group saw their lazy eye’s sight improve by at least two lines on an eye chart — from 20/40 to 20/25, for example.

More than twice as many children who received acupuncture overcame the condition compared to those who wore an eye patch: 42 percent versus 17 percent.

While Gearinger suggests that the concept is interesting and the potential for an alternate treatment for lazy eye encouraging, he cautions that the number of children studied was small. He also noted that the treatment option may be impractical in the U.S., where there are few acupuncturists with experience treating lazy eye.

Even if they were available, “it is a lot to ask parents to drive to a local acupuncturist 5 days a week, rather than just using drops or a patch at home,” he said.

Dr. Peter Lipson, an internist in southeastern Michigan, also pointed to some limitations of the study, including the fact that “everyone knew who was patched and who got acupuncture,” which could have biased the outcomes.

Lipson, who was not involved in the work, further suggested that without an untreated group the study can’t rule out the possibility that not doing anything, or simply using corrective glasses and performing daily exercises, would work just as well.

“This is not, in my opinion, evidence toward acupuncture being as good as standard care, only that in this particular study children did about the same if they received standard care or non-standard care,” Lipson told Reuters Health. “It says nothing at all about acupuncture.”

The researchers speculate in the Archives of Ophthalmology that acupuncture needles placed at vision-related points on the body might work by increasing the blood flow to both the eye and brain. But they acknowledge that what lies behind acupuncture’s apparent success remains unclear.

Ritch and his team are following up with more studies to improve the understanding of how acupuncture may be helpful for lazy eye.

“Don’t knock Chinese medicine,” said Ritch. “It’s been around for more than 3,000 years and there’s a lot we don’t understand yet.”

SOURCE: http://link.reuters.com/ren89q Archives of Ophthalmology, online December 13, 2010.